There are frequent calls for transformation and reform in the education sector going back decades. As a starting point, I’m going to examine two reports -- one well-known (“A Nation at Risk”) and the other lesser so (the “Sandia Report”) -- that attempt to answer the question posed in the title. Over the next several posts, I will offer my own thoughts as to the need for educational transformation (spoiler alert, I think it is necessary). In those future articles, I’ll provide a definition for transformation as well as a description for what exactly we would be transforming from and what we would be transforming to. But first, let’s dive into those two reports.
Read MoreThe four components of the System of Profound Knowledge interact with each other and cannot be separated. For example, as outlined in last month’s post, the Theory of Knowledge relies on one’s ability to separate statistical variation into common and special causes to learn about and improve a system. Each part of Profound Knowledge is interdependent and equal in importance. Nonetheless, in my study, if there is one of the four components that seems to flow through each of the others, it is Psychology. Psychology involves understanding the actions and reactions of people in everyday circumstances.
Read MoreHow do we improve the math engagement rates discussed in last month’s post? In other words, what would your theory be for improving these rates?
Don’t get too caught up in the idea of theory. By theory I mean any set of assumptions that you use to predict what’s going to happen in the future. Here, I simply mean the plan or strategy you’d suggest to improve those rates. The plan or strategy you choose is based on the prediction that it will improve the 8th grade math engagement rates, and your underlying rationale for your choice in plan or strategy is your theory. Theory of Knowledge then is the study of how what we think we know and claim to know actually is the way we claim it is.
There is variation in everything we observe and measure in schools. Knowledge about Variation provides a tool kit by which to understand this variation. Educators are inundated with data, but what’s much more difficult is knowing how to interpret and make sound decisions with it. Do this year’s state test scores indicate that our district is improving? Was last month’s drop in per pupil revenue a sign of things to come? Did attendance rates improve this week because of the intervention we put in place or was it due to something else? The ability to answer questions like these is fundamental to our ability to make improvements.
Read MoreAppreciation for a System quite literally means that we step back and see the organization we lead as a system. Dr. Deming recognized that organizations are characterized by a set of interactions among the people who work there, the tools, methods, and materials they have at their disposal, and the processes through which these people and resources join to accomplish its work. This is the essence of a system. In my experience, systems leaders fall short of this appreciation most commonly in two areas. First, we overemphasize the extent to which problems can be attributed to individual educators as opposed to the underlying system. Second, we often fail to appreciate the idea that improvement in one area of our school system can lead to a decline in performance in the system as a whole.
Read MoreI have this hunch that we’ve significantly underappreciated the role of theory in school improvement. My basic hypothesis is that the vast majority of educators doing improvement work are doing so without a sound theoretical foundation. Instead, we’re overly focused on techniques and tools, but in the absence of theory to guide us, there can be no learning. I’ve been writing about the System of Profound Knowledge over the course of the last 20 months because it has transformed my thinking about managing and improving schools.
Read MoreHow many of you have pursued the school improvement “magic elixir''?
The “magic elixir” has come in many forms across my more than two-decade career in education, and I suspect you’ll recognize its siren song even if you haven’t fallen prey yourself. It may have reared its head as a reading curriculum, an online tutoring platform, a revised organizational structure, or a new five-year strategic plan. You may have dabbled in all four of these areas—curriculum, online programs, human capital planning, and strategic initiatives—among many others. The attraction to these “magic elixirs” doesn’t seem to weaken, even when you recognize that there is no such thing.
Read MoreWhen we as educational leaders are confronted with a problem, we typically assemble a school or district team to attempt to improve it. The team relies on the expertise they’ve acquired across their careers as classroom teachers, building administrators, and district level leaders. Let’s call this subject matter-knowledge. It includes skills like data-driven instruction, curriculum planning, and leading professional development, among many other activities. Subject-matter knowledge is critical for developing changes that result in improvement. While an obvious necessity, this type of knowledge alone is insufficient.
Read MoreFor the past four months, I’ve been writing about organizational goal-setting. In Part I of the series, I proposed four conditions that organizations should understand prior to setting a goal. In Part II, I introduced the idea of “arbitrary and capricious” education goals as well as the first five of my 10 Key Lessons for Data Analysis. In Part III I rounded out the lessons with an introduction to lessons 6-10. In this installment, we’ll take a look at an applied example of the lessons in action.
Read MoreFor the past three months, I’ve been writing about organizational goal-setting. In Part I of the series, I proposed four conditions that organizations should understand prior to setting a goal. In Part II, I introduced the idea of “arbitrary and capricious” education goals and key data analysis lessons 1-5 . In this installment, I’ll outline key lessons 6-10 and then tie up the series in Part IV with an applied example from United Schools Network.
Read MoreJanuary is a popular month to set new goals, so I decided to kick-off this year with a four-part series on this very topic. In Part I of the series, I proposed four conditions that organizations should understand prior to setting a goal.
Organizations should understand the capability of the system or process under study.
Organizations should understand variation within the system or process under study.
Organizations should understand if the system or process under study is stable.
Organizations should have a logical answer to the question, “By what method?”
Absent an understanding of these conditions, goals are too often “arbitrary and capricious.”
At a recent district leadership team meeting, I put the following quote up on a slide: “Goal setting is often an act of desperation.”1 We are in the midst of updating our strategic plan at United Schools Network, so the purpose of the quote was to start a discussion on healthy goal-setting and to provide a framework for any goal-setting the team would do as a part of this process. I think the typical reaction to the quote is something like the following: “But I thought goal-setting was something highly effective people and organizations do?” I would argue however, that this is rarely the case, be it in organizations or accountability systems, and only can be true if a number of conditions are met during the process.
Read More